Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Playing nice with (drug addict) Rush Limbaugh

At least we know where Limbaugh got his name, as in, "MAN! What a Rush!". These days the word Rush should be applied to anyone who's an overweight, hypocritical, drug addicted, loud mouth. On a related note has the Oxycontin king been on another viagra trip with "the boys" down to The Dominican Republic?

--
Playing nice with Rush Limbaugh
by Eric Boehlert

Question: When is an apology not an apology?

Answer: When the press corps is
covering for
Rush Limbaugh.

Last week's spectacle of right-wing talker Limbaugh
mocking actor Michael J. Fox for allegedly faking the symptoms of his crippling Parkinson's disease while appearing in a Democratic-sponsored campaign ad was equaled only by the media spectacle of news
outlets erroneously, and methodically, reporting that the talker quickly apologized for his outlandish smear. Things got so bad that at one point news consumers were better off reading the Canadian press to find out the actual facts of the American-based controversy. (Fox is a native of Edmonton, which explained the Canadian interest in the story.)

And it's not like the facts were complicated. Fox made a heartfelt plea urging voters in Missouri to support Democratic Senate candidate Claire McCaskill, who he stated "shares [his] hope for cures" through stem cell research. Limbaugh promptly belittled the actor, telling listeners the herky-jerky motions Fox was making during the commercial were a con; "purely an act" to elicit an emotional response. Limbaugh even uncorked spastic, in-studio gesticulations to mimic Fox's awkward appearance.

Limbaugh said if he was proven wrong he'd apologized. But the press took that for an apology itself. Days later, as the controversy raged, Limbaugh was even clearer,
insisting, "I stand by what I said [about Fox]. I take back none of what I said. I wouldn't rephrase it any differently. It is what I believe. It is what I think. It is what I have found to be true."

That quote was key to understanding the radical, remorseless position Limbaugh had staked out for himself. And here, according to a search of the Nexis database, is a
list of major Canadian papers that published the direct, "I stand by what I said" quote from Limbaugh:

The Edmonton Journal, The Gazette (Montreal), the Regina Leader-Post (Saskatchewan), the National Post, the Ottawa Citizen, the Saskatoon StarPhoenix (Saskatchewan), The Province (Vancouver, British Columbia), the Vancouver Sun (British Columbia), and the Windsor Star (Ontario) Meanwhile, here's a list of major American newspapers that published the same revealing quote from Limbaugh:

(Crickets)

The sounds of silence were fitting for a press corps that treated Limbaugh's allegation as rational, manufactured a central element of the story (his 'apology'), mischaracterized Fox's commercial, suggested his actions had "spark[ed]" the controversy, and absolutely refused to put Limbaugh's attack in any sort of historical context regarding the talker's established record of hate speech.

But this is nothing new. Despite Limbaugh torrent of rhetoric about how the press vilifies him (it's called a schtick; every radio talk show host needs one), the truth is Beltway media players routinely play nice with Limbaugh and his fringe brand of conservatism. Anxious for his right-wing seal of approval (and spooked by his liberal bias charges), the mainstream press corps has for years treated Limbaugh
with undeserved respect, worked to soften his radical edges, and presented him as simply a partisan pundit.
Continue:

2 Comments:

At 11:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A link to Media Matters, nothing more need be said.

 
At 9:08 AM, Blogger Dean said...

Agreed. Imagine if it was a Faux News link EEYEEEWWW!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

asp hit counter
hit counters